28 October 2008
Dear parents, families and friends,
Greetings from Africa! As I write, my bags are packed and I am looking forward to flying home to the US tonight. I am also a little sad though to be leaving so soon. We have an amazing group of students on the FSP this year. They are curious, extremely engaged and obviously highly intelligent and I have had a great time exploring and learning with them.
After my arrival to South Africa to prepare for the program on September 14, I was joined by the students on September 22, 2008. Following four days of orientation and introductory lectures at the University of Pretoria, we headed out on our first 20-day field trip. Our first stop on the field trip was a major success. We spent a week in a rural setting in Limpopo province, to the northeast of South Africa. Here, the students had a glimpse of rural life in Africa, including two days and two nights spent with a rural host family. This rural life experience definitely made an impression on all the students. Following the home-stays, we had a debriefing session where students shared their impressions of the rural home-stays; our conversations went late into the night. The following day, we had a scheduled group discussion based on a reading entitled “Cross-cultural research: issues of power, positionality and ‘race’.” As it turned out this was the perfect timing to be discussing this paper because the students deftly applied their experiences in the home-stays to the concepts explored in this reading. Although the discussion was scheduled to last 40 minutes, I had to bring it to a close after two hours of animated conversation.
This is the first time we have ever done rural home stays on the FSP and I am confident that this is a great addition to the program.
After the Limpopo rural setting, we travelled to Timbavati game reserve. This is the eighth year that our program has visited Timbavati. As usual, our academic program there focused on the ecology and the natural history of the African savanna. We also took time to enjoy game viewing at sunset, and for the first time in a many years, our group was able to see all the “BIG FIVE.” Do you know what the big five of the African savanna are? Also, for the first time ever, I gave the natural history quiz in the field; I wrote the questions on a white board hanged under a Marula tree. One of the questions on the natural history quiz was this “List two differences and two similarities between African grassland ecosystems (e.g. The Serengeti, Timbavati) and North American grassland ecosystems (e.g. Yellowstone National Park).
Following our Timbavati experiences, we had a two day break at Skukuza; Skukuza is a town within the Kruger National Park. At Skukuza we did laundry, caught up on e-mail and on sleep (our days at Timbavati started at 5 am), and also enjoyed some soccer.
Our field trip’s final six days were spent on the southeastern part of South Africa at the border with Mozambique, in northern KwaZulu Natal Province. Here, we did another first. At Tembe Elephant Park, we collected the first data set, in a planned long-term study, that will use the abundance of dung beetles to measure if elephants are converting the endemic sand forest habitat into woodland habitat. Dung beetles are most abundant in woodland habitat where elephants and other ungulates mostly feed. Our plan is that subsequent groups of this FSP will collect data to contribute to this long-term project. We set up the dung beetle traps, sorted the beetles from by-catch and analyzed the preliminary data. We found that fenced-in, undisturbed, sand forest has a lower abundance of dung beetles than disturbed sand forests and woodland habitat.
As Professor Roebuck mentioned in his first letter, I have been busy grading field reports and the mid-term exam since our return to Pretoria. I can say that I am very impressed with the students’ work.
In case you were wondering here is a sampling of the questions that I asked on the mid-term exam. For ENVS 40: Natural Resources and Environmental Issues in Southern Africa: In lectures, readings and discussions we explored how environmental change (habitat change, climate change, etc.) may impact the health and well being of animals and humans across the globe. Drawing on your experiences on our just concluded field trip, discuss the likely challenges posed by environmental change to health and well being of animals and humans in South Africa.
And for, ENVS 42: Social and Political Aspects of Development Conservation in Southern Africa: You learned about the variety of ways in which conservation and rural development are being pursued jointly. The umbrella term “community-based conservation (CBC)” is often used to refer to these efforts. Draw upon the conceptual approaches that were presented, or alluded to, in readings, lectures and discussions to contrast CBC as practiced at haMakuya, Timabavati, Tembe Elephant Reserve, and Phinda game reserve. From the readings, your own lecture notes and observations, propose three criteria by which to evaluate the effectiveness of these approaches. Two of your criteria should emphasize the social dimensions of CBC and one should emphasize conservation and ecological objectives. You should choose criteria that, in your view, capture the essence of what CBC should accomplish in the social and ecological realms. Briefly defend your choice of criteria by discussing the relative strengths and weaknesses of each the three approaches.
All the students are happy, healthy and thoroughly enjoying their new urban homes stay experiences.
Sincerely,
David N. M. Mbora